Observational Learning And Violence On Tv, Articles D

The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. When should you challenge an editors decision to reject a paper? Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more . [CDATA[// >Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - Reddit What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Technical reasons usually require more work such as further experiments or analysis before your work can be published. So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Revised Submission Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. For more information, please see our Dove Editorial has communicated the Editor-in-Chief's decision to the author (s) and Dove is awaiting a revised and/or resubmitted manuscript. 2002 Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. Is my manuscript likely to be peer reviewed by now? I think typically desk rejects happen in a few days. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. The status of your paper will be displayed in a tabular view. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Geosphere: geosphere@geosociety.org. Differentiate between reviewer comments and your responses in your letter. and our As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a If the decision is not to send the manuscript for assessment, the Editor in Chief contacts the author with the decision. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. and JavaScript. For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. Did you find it helpful? The author is being contacted about the Editor-in-Chief's decision. You can avoid these rejection reasons by following the journal specific guidelines, ensuring you write a coherent paper in good English and honestly assessing you work when deciding on a target journal. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of . Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Let us suggest an alternative journal within our esteemed publishing portfolio for resubmitting your manuscript (and any reviewer comments) for fast, effortless publication. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Appeals must be rational arguments not emotional ones so be sure you have enough evidence before trying to change the editors mind. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. News stories and other reporting about articles should not appear any earlier than the posting of the online paper. Popular answers (1) In my experience you can challenge an editor's decision when the review is clearly biased. Critical review determines the suitability and originality of the paper and the adequacy and conciseness of the presentation. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. How to submit a journal article manuscript. In this case, it is important to notify the editors that you are withdrawing your manuscript, and get confirmation that this it has been withdrawn, before you submit it to a different journal. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. The permissions to draft and send decision letters can be configured differently by editor role and decision term. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? on 25 Jun, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Plants known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. When submitting a revised manuscript, the author follows the same submission steps and the revised paper again goes through an initial quality check. More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. Brij M Upreti Good research journals mention time of processing in journal home page, but that time is average time, which also include desk rejection as first decision in that average.. Report: Pending. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? Nature. Note that in both comments (agreeing and disagreeing) the author is polite and shows respect for the reviewers opinion. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. a cover letter that provides any additional information requested by the editors. Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. Provide a polite and scholarly rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with. Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. //-->What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Journals with following an open or transparent peer review model will share the identities of the reviewers with the author(s). Privacy Policy. Thank you for visiting nature.com. In Review. Incomplete data. They should be able to offer you an extension but it is best to discuss this with them as early as possible. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. [CDATA[> [CDATA[// >